'Searching for the Truth about Ruth Ellis' by Monica Weller – EVERYTHING ON MY BLOG IS COPYRIGHT & MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED ANYWHERE WITHOUT MY WRITTEN PERMISSION

April 12, 2016

“Remarkable book”

 

Someone mentioned this review of our book by LD on Amazon. I felt I should share it with readers of my blog:

“This is a remarkable book. Unlike some other reviewers, I do not find this book badly written. On the contrary I think that the freelance writer that assisted Muriel Jakubait has done a good job of shining a light into a very dark and complex corner of British history whilst preserving the simple, ordinary voice of a woman who has been forced to wake up from the semi-conscious ignorance of a by-gone era to a very painful consciousness of the evil that man is capable of and the treachery of her own country. This is more than just the story of Ruth Ellis from the point of view of her own sister, it is an exposé of the hidden side of the British psyche – a contribution to the explanation of how we managed to spawn creatures like Jimmy Savile and why our country is infested with child abuse, corrupt policing and broken government.

For those people who think that Muriel’ s account of the sexual abuse she and Ruth suffered at the hands of their own father does not ring true then I suggest they read the papers more closely and study the photograph of this man published in the book with a little more attention. Muriel’s own struggle to see her family as respectable against the evidence of her terrible childhood experiences, to me, were a moving testament to her desperate efforts to counter the image pushed in the media of the family and of Ruth as being, common and worthless. The family was surely dysfunctional but the efforts to reach upwards and out of poverty and ignorance ultimately pushed Ruth towards destruction and Muriel towards truth out of love for her sister. This is no sugar-coated, flowery love but real and flawed love that nevertheless sees Muriel achieve a level of understanding that raises her above the academic and ironically from a docile almost bovine trust in those around her to the position of being accused of being a conspiracy theorist. This family was dysfunctional but certainly no more dysfunctional than many and certainly not worthless. There is however the uncanny feeling throughout the book that they were somehow stalked by evil – it transpires, for instance that one childhood home backed onto that of Lesley-Ann Downey’s ( the little girl murdered by Ian Brady and Myra Hindley) mother

The upshot is that Muriel believes, and provides some convincing evidence, that Ruth’s demise was engineered by the British Establishment because she knew too much about something – possibly related to the brewing spying scandals of the time. This is not as incredible as it sounds. She did not come to this conviction easily but was pushed by events to realise that reality was not as she thought it was. Take the trial for instance – you would imagine that in a country on the verge of abolishing the death penalty, which was increasingly condemned as barbaric, that the legal Establishment would take an avoidant attitude to this drastic sentence. In this case the trial took place two months after the offence, took one and a half days during which Judge Havers instructed the jury that they could not consider a verdict that took into account provocation thus effectively telling them they must convict on premeditated murder (hanging) or nothing. The Establishment wanted rid of Ruth Ellis. The question is, why?

It can get confusing – many names, dates, places – but this type of book often is. It is useful to read this in conjunction with How The English Establishment Framed STEPHEN WARD by Caroline Kennedy and Phillip Knightley as it provides a lot of further information about events of the time and how the “Establishment” may operate particularly in terms of corruption of our core institutions. But when it comes to an instinctual feel for what was really going on, I would trust Muriel. Stephen Ward is undoubtedly a central character in what happened to Ruth Ellis and contrary to the Rex Harrison, Pygmalion-style gentleman character portrayed by Kennedy and Knightley, Ward was grooming young, vulnerable women from dysfunctional families for some reason which still remains unclear to me and at least some of these women came to very unpleasant ends.

Finally, if you want to start building up a picture of the murky world from which Jimmy Savile and Dolphin Square emerged , books like these provide invaluable historical insights.”

March 4, 2016

Daily Mail article about Ruth Ellis in Lady Godiva Rides Again

Filed under: Uncategorized — copperknob @ 2:35 pm
Tags: , , , ,

 

Following on from my complaint to the Daily Mail (see my Post of 26 February) about their article published on 23 February about Ruth Ellis in the 1951 film ‘Lady Godiva Rides Again’ in which I received no credit for my book or blog from which they uplifted information without my permission, I’m pleased to say my updated story has been published today in both the Daily Mail (p 62) and the Scottish Daily Mail:

http://www.pressreader.com/uk/scottish-daily-mail/20160304/283102773141484

Daily Mail Friday 4 March 2016

Ruth Ellis Daily Mail March 2016 (2) (1024x897)

 

Monica Weller

 

February 26, 2016

Ruth Ellis in Lady Godiva Rides Again (1951)

The information about Ruth Ellis’s appearance in the 1951 film Lady Godiva Rides Again was not known about until I uncovered it whilst ghost writing our book RUTH ELLIS MY SISTER’S SECRET LIFE. It was not common knowledge. Not even Muriel Jakubait knew about her sister’s role in the film. This new finding appeared exclusively in our book. Since 2005 when the book was published I began this blog Searching for the Truth about Ruth Ellis. It was originally based on 6 articles I wrote for True Detective magazine and is my platform to share with readers my continuing research and new first hand information I have uncovered.

I make it clear that everything on my blog is copyright. I am disappointed therefore, that whoever wrote the article below (that has been brought to my attention) has not only used my work, but has not credited me, my blog, or our book RUTH ELLIS MY SISTER’S SECRET LIFE.

I’ve subsequently found out (as mentioned in a comment below) that the piece appeared in a Question and Answer section in the Daily Mail on Tuesday February 23rd on page 51. Sections of this blog have been transferred, wholesale, in to the ‘Answer’.

Perhaps Caroline Jacks of Wheatley, Oxon, whose name appears at the end of the piece would like to contact me. Thank you.

Monica Weller

DD a (603x1024)

 

February 14, 2016

The Magdala closes

Filed under: Uncategorized — copperknob @ 12:10 am

The Magdala public house in Hampstead has closed.

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/environment/famous_ruth_ellis_murder_pub_the_magdala_shuts_its_doors_1_4417496

Magdala1 (2) (537x800)

Above – Magdala window through which an off-duty police officer, inside, allegedly saw Ruth Ellis outside prior to the shooting

 

Magdala2

 

Below

The press had already found Ruth Ellis guilty before she stepped inside the Old Bailey at the beginning of her trial.

Magdala3 (581x800)

January 3, 2016

Happy New Year

Filed under: Uncategorized — copperknob @ 12:01 pm

…wishing all followers of my blog, all over the world, a happy, peaceful, and healthy new year.

I will continue in my search for the truth about Ruth Ellis and will present my latest findings here on my blog.

In return I trust that my followers will show respect for my copyright research.

If you want to comment on my blog please also give your proper name and email address. Your email address will not be shown.

Thank You.

Monica Weller

 

December 20, 2015

Leatherhead Advertiser 17 December 2015

Filed under: Uncategorized — copperknob @ 12:19 am

leatherhead ad december 2015 (647x800) (2)

December 13, 2015

Ruth Ellis’s Letters – The Set Up

Part Four

One thing comes to mind at this point….a day in 2002 when I was interviewing Muriel Jakubait, Ruth Ellis’s elder sister. She told me how she’d had a phone call from Ruth; she thought it must have been some weeks before Blakely’s murder and while she was living in Egerton Gardens in London. Muriel said Ruth was in a state and told her that she was being “set up”. Muriel didn’t understand what Ruth meant and couldn’t remember any more about the conversation. As I was unable to uncover any more detail to back up this circumstantial evidence I felt I could not include the reference to the conversation in the manuscript of our book. But I did promise myself that if the occasion arose I would mention it. Thirteen years after that conversation with Muriel, and with my additional research, I believe the time is right.

~

Ruth Ellis was observed in Holloway prison around the clock from the day she entered Holloway Prison Hospital on 11th April 1955 to the moment she stepped out of the condemned cell to be hanged on 13 July 1955.

 

Evelyn Galilee was Ruth’s wardress who guarded Ruth while she was in the condemned cell and was with her from very early on the morning of her execution. Evelyn (217x300) (2) (145x200)

Evelyn spoke to me following the publication of RUTH ELLIS, MY SISTER’S SECRET LIFE. One of the facts challenged by Evelyn’s eyewitness account is the authenticity of letters that Ruth Ellis apparently wrote and sent from the condemned cell.

Ruth Ellis letter3

Firstly, all the letters allegedly written by Ruth, were written in pen. Evelyn told me categorically that “No prisoner in the condemned cell was allowed to use a pen, everything had to be written in pencil and was strictly supervised.”

Also, the “Letter officer” at Holloway prison would have blanked out names on letters that Ruth sent from prison, yet names are clearly mentioned in Ruth’s correspondence.

Finally, in Ruth’s letter dated 12th July 1955, to Mr Simmons, her original solicitor, she refers to remarks made by David Blakely’s brother in a newspaper article following her trial. Evelyn informed me that, “No prisoner in the condemned cell was allowed access to a newspaper or its contents.”

In 2007 I managed to trace a relation of Mr Simmons, who with Mr Mishcon had visited Ruth Ellis in the condemned cell at Holloway prison at midday on 12 July 1955 the day before she was executed. The relation told me on the phone that Mr Simmons had received “the most extraordinary letter” from Ruth Ellis written just before she was hanged. “He kept it preciously. But it disappeared sometime in the 1970s”. Mr Simmons never saw it again.

Were these letters (not accounted for in the Hospital Case Papers) allegedly written by Ruth Ellis to her solicitors Mr Mishcon and Mr Simmons on 12th/13th July 1955, produced by someone who had received training in the technique of faking handwriting? If so, it’s unthinkable. And who was that someone?

Monica Weller

 

December 11, 2015

The Hospital Case Papers

Filed under: Uncategorized — copperknob @ 12:21 pm

Part Three

In Part One of Ruth Ellis’s Letters and the Hospital Case Papers I mentioned that Ruth Ellis was under strict observation day and night in the prison hospital, from 11th April 1955 until 21 June 1955. Everything about Ruth was recorded in the Hospital Case Papers ledger, for example: what she ate and how well she ate it; if she took supper; what she drank; if she had cocoa at night time; how she slept; whether she was talkative or quiet; how she read most of the time; how she rested in bed most of the day; how she arranged a bunch of flowers; that she was calm and pleasant; how she played patience in bed; and how she seemed after seeing her solicitors. On 11 April 1955 it was also stated in the ledger that “the police have taken possession of her spectacles”.

Ten years separate my investigations into the Hospital Case Papers. I originally looked at them when they were newly released at The National Archives. This week I decided to look at those papers again with fresh eyes!

This week at The National Archives, while sitting in the Invigilation Room, it suddenly struck me, by its absence, that there is no mention in the file containing the Hospital Case Papers, of Ruth Ellis writing a letter to Mrs Cook, Blakely’s mother on 12 April 1955. In fact there is no mention of any writing being done by Ruth Ellis until 25 April 1955 when the Evening Report in the ledger stated:

“Has been writing and reading most of the evening. No complaints”.

Nor is there any mention in the ledger of Ruth writing letters three months later to her solicitors Mr Mishcon and Mr Simmons on 12/13th July 1955 – shown on my Blog Post dated 3 December 2015.

It wasn’t until 13 June 1955 that her letter writing was referred to in the Hospital Case Papers. I read:

…”writes letters poorly spelt but business like and ?(word illegible) to her friends and relatives”.

When I visited The National Archives ten years ago on Saturday 12 November 2005 I listed fourteen new pieces of evidence that I managed to find in the newly released files. One new item refers to page 49 of a police statement made by Detective Chief Inspector L Davies of Golders Green police station in which he is referring to the letter apparently written by Ruth Ellis on 12 April 1955. It was addressed to Mrs Cook and had been returned to the police. The statement read:

“No enquiry has yet been made to ascertain particulars of the person who can speak of receiving this letter. It is addressed to Mrs Cook but this lady is old and is very ill following the death of her son”.

The entry in The Hospital Case Paper for 11th July 1955:

“Weight 103lbs. To be no reprieve”

And for the 13th July 1955:

“Executed 9am”

more to follow

 

 

 

December 10, 2015

Ruth Ellis Writes to Mrs Cook on 12 April 1955. Or Does She?

Filed under: Uncategorized — copperknob @ 1:54 pm

Part Two

In Robert Hancock’s 1963 book, “Ruth Ellis the last woman to be hanged” Hancock wrote:

Robert hancock ruth ellis letter2

Robert Hancock ruth ellis letter1

 

 

The following is from Laurence Marks and Tony Van Den Bergh’s 1977 book “Ruth Ellis, A case of diminished responsibility?”

Ruth Ellis Letter Van Den B 1

Ruth Ellis Letter Van Den B 2

Georgina Ellis in her 1995 book “Ruth Ellis, My Mother” wrote:

Ruth Ellis Letter Georgina1

Ruth Ellis Letter Georgina2Carol Ann Lee in her 2012 book “A fine day for a hanging, The Real Ruth Ellis Story” makes reference to the Hospital Case Papers. On numerous occasions she quotes specifically from various ledger entries. However, on the subject of Ruth Ellis’s letter to Mrs Cook dated 12.5.1955, instead of quoting from the Hospital Case Paper she wrote the following:

Ruth Ellis Letter Carol Ann Lee1

Ruth Ellis Letter Carol Ann Lee2

 

From reading these excerpts from the four books it would be easy to assume Ruth Ellis did sit down and compose a letter on 12 April 1955.

However things were not as simple as they may have appeared from the typed and signed copy of Ruth Ellis’s letter almost on its own at the very back of the Hospital Case Paper file, and from which all four authors in question have quoted. Was there another interpretation?

to be continued

Monica Weller

December 9, 2015

Ruth Ellis’s Letters and the Hospital Case Papers

Part One

Yesterday, Tuesday 8th December, I returned to The National Archives in Kew. I ordered various Ruth Ellis files including a file containing the Hospital Case Papers that I originally looked through when it was first released into the Archives sometime in 2005 AFTER our book RUTH ELLIS MY SISTER’S SECRET LIFE was published.

When I scanned my Reader’s Card to check on the progress of my order I found that two files had to be read in what’s called the Invigilation Room at the Archives. I would have to be checked in and out and while I was in there would be watched over by a CCTV camera. These files contained, amongst other things, documents that could only be seen under supervision. One file contained photographs of David Blakely’s dead body; according to a member of TNA staff they could upset other researchers in the main reading room. But I didn’t understand why the Hospital Case Papers would have to be viewed in secret. This must be a new rule as I looked through them originally in the main reading room.

The Hospital Case Papers are a complete record in ledger form of Ruth Ellis from the day she was admitted to Holloway Prison Hospital on 11.4.1955 until she is discharged from the hospital on 21.6.1955. She was under strict observation day and night in the prison hospital.

In 2006 I wrote a series of six articles for True Detective magazine that were published between April and September that year. I uploaded the articles on to this blog and to view them you’ll need to scroll down to my blog Post dated 19.9.2012. The National Archives emailed me as soon as the Hospital Case Papers were released there inviting me to view the newly released file. It was in these papers I discovered Ruth Ellis, on admission to Holloway Prison Hospital on 11 April 1955, had admitted to the hospital doctor, sometime between 5.10 pm and 5.43 pm that she had actually had an abortion not long before the shooting; not a miscarriage as she had previously stated to the police which she claimed had been caused by Blakely punching her in the stomach.

Next, I must briefly turn to Robert Hancock, Laurence Marks and Tony Van Den Bergh, Georgina Ellis and Carol Ann Lee’s accounts in their respective books on Ruth Ellis, as to how Ellis came to write a letter to David Blakely’s mother on 12 April 1955.

…more to follow shortly

Part Two

In Robert Hancock’s 1963 book, “Ruth Ellis the last woman to be hanged” Hancock wrote:

Robert hancock ruth ellis letter2

Robert Hancock ruth ellis letter1

 

 

The following is from Laurence Marks and Tony Van Den Bergh’s 1977 book “Ruth Ellis, A case of diminished responsibility?”

Ruth Ellis Letter Van Den B 1

Ruth Ellis Letter Van Den B 2

Georgina Ellis in her 1995 book “Ruth Ellis, My Mother” wrote:

Ruth Ellis Letter Georgina1

Ruth Ellis Letter Georgina2Carol Ann Lee in her 2012 book “A fine day for a hanging, The Real Ruth Ellis Story” makes reference to the Hospital Case Papers. On numerous occasions she quotes specifically from various ledger entries. However, on the subject of Ruth Ellis’s letter to Mrs Cook dated 12.5.1955, instead of quoting from the Hospital Case Paper she wrote the following:

Ruth Ellis Letter Carol Ann Lee1

Ruth Ellis Letter Carol Ann Lee2

 

From reading these excerpts from the four books it would be easy to assume Ruth Ellis did sit down and compose a letter on 12 April 1955.

However things were not as simple as they may have appeared from the typed and signed copy of Ruth Ellis’s letter almost on its own at the very back of the Hospital Case Paper file, and from which all four authors in question have quoted. Was there another interpretation?

to be continued

Monica Weller

 

Part Three

In Part One of Ruth Ellis’s Letters and the Hospital Case Papers I mentioned that Ruth Ellis was under strict observation day and night in the prison hospital, from 11th April 1955 until 21 June 1955. Everything about Ruth was recorded in the Hospital Case Papers ledger, for example: what she ate and how well she ate it; if she took supper; what she drank; if she had cocoa at night time; how she slept; whether she was talkative or quiet; how she read most of the time; how she rested in bed most of the day; how she arranged a bunch of flowers; that she was calm and pleasant; how she played patience in bed; and how she seemed after seeing her solicitors. On 11 April 1955 it was also stated in the ledger that “the police have taken possession of her spectacles”.

Ten years separate my investigations into the Hospital Case Papers. I originally looked at them when they were newly released at The National Archives. This week I decided to look at those papers again with fresh eyes!

This week at The National Archives, while sitting in the Invigilation Room, it suddenly struck me, by its absence, that there is no mention in the file containing the Hospital Case Papers, of Ruth Ellis writing a letter to Mrs Cook, Blakely’s mother on 12 April 1955. In fact there is no mention of any writing being done by Ruth Ellis until 25 April 1955 when the Evening Report in the ledger stated:

“Has been writing and reading most of the evening. No complaints”.

Nor is there any mention in the ledger of Ruth writing letters three months later to her solicitors Mr Mishcon and Mr Simmons on 12/13th July 1955 – shown on my Blog Post dated 3 December 2015.

It wasn’t until 13 June 1955 that her letter writing was referred to in the Hospital Case Papers. I read:

…”writes letters poorly spelt but business like and ?(word illegible) to her friends and relatives”.

When I visited The National Archives ten years ago on Saturday 12 November 2005 I listed fourteen new pieces of evidence that I managed to find in the newly released files. One new item refers to page 49 of a police statement made by Detective Chief Inspector L Davies of Golders Green police station in which he is referring to the letter apparently written by Ruth Ellis on 12 April 1955. It was addressed to Mrs Cook and had been returned to the police. The statement read:

“No enquiry has yet been made to ascertain particulars of the person who can speak of receiving this letter. It is addressed to Mrs Cook but this lady is old and is very ill following the death of her son”.

The entry in The Hospital Case Paper for 11th July 1955:

“Weight 103lbs. To be no reprieve”

And for the 13th July 1955:

“Executed 9am”

more to follow

Part Four

One thing comes to mind at this point….a day in 2002 when I was interviewing Muriel Jakubait, Ruth Ellis’s elder sister. She told me how she’d had a phone call from Ruth; she thought it must have been some weeks before Blakely’s murder and while she was living in Egerton Gardens in London. Muriel said Ruth was in a state and told her that she was being “set up”. Muriel didn’t understand what Ruth meant and couldn’t remember any more about the conversation. As I was unable to uncover any more detail to back up this circumstantial evidence I felt I could not include the reference to the conversation in the manuscript of our book. But I did promise myself that if the occasion arose I would mention it. Thirteen years after that conversation with Muriel, and with my additional research, I believe the time is right.

~

Ruth Ellis was observed in Holloway prison around the clock from the day she entered Holloway Prison Hospital on 11th April 1955 to the moment she stepped out of the condemned cell to be hanged on 13 July 1955.

Evelyn Galilee was Ruth’s wardress who guarded Ruth while she was in the condemned cell and was with her from very early on the morning of her execution. Evelyn spoke to me following the publication of RUTH ELLIS, MY SISTER’S SECRET LIFE. One of the facts challenged by Evelyn’s eyewitness account is the authenticity of letters that Ruth Ellis apparently wrote and sent from the condemned cell.

Ruth Ellis letter3

Firstly, all the letters allegedly written by Ruth, were written in pen. Evelyn told me categorically that “No prisoner in the condemned cell was allowed to use a pen, everything had to be written in pencil and was strictly supervised.”

Also, the “Letter officer” at Holloway prison would have blanked out names on letters that Ruth sent from prison, yet names are clearly mentioned in Ruth’s correspondence.

Finally, in Ruth’s letter dated 12th July 1955, to Mr Simmons, her original solicitor, she refers to remarks made by David Blakely’s brother in a newspaper article following her trial. Evelyn informed me that, “No prisoner in the condemned cell was allowed access to a newspaper or its contents.”

In 2007 I managed to trace a relation of Mr Simmons, who with Mr Mishcon had visited Ruth Ellis in the condemned cell at Holloway prison at midday on 12 July 1955 the day before she was executed. The relation told me on the phone that Mr Simmons had received “the most extraordinary letter” from Ruth Ellis written just before she was hanged. “He kept it preciously. But it disappeared sometime in the 1970s”. Mr Simmons never saw it again.

Were these letters (not accounted for in the Hospital Case Papers) allegedly written by Ruth Ellis to her solicitors Mr Mishcon and Mr Simmons on 12th/13th July 1955, produced by someone who had received training in the technique of faking handwriting? If so, it’s unthinkable. And who was that someone?

Monica Weller

 

 

 

Next Page »

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers